Don't make me angry. You won't like me when I'm angry.

Finances and crises


I write about the financial crisis because the banks and their behavior make me angry and I want people to know; to know about bank behavior and about me being angry.
It started with me reading Johan Norberg's Financial Fiasco. At first I just thought I could write a fairly short post but it has grown, for me it has become a pretty big undertaking. It really isn't much news, mostly just me repeating what I've read.
It is quite possible to be both rich and productive. I write mainly about people both rich and destructive, about those behind the subprime crisis, about those behind the Too Big To Fail banks and about their cronies. In my posts I have many links, I really recommend them to those who want to know more.
My main source is the blog Naked Capitalism. I have mailed them to ask what they think, I've got no answer so I hope it's OK. I don't know if they are always right. When it comes to criticism of banks and other financial institutions, they seem well supported by evidence.

I have no financial training. It is possible that I am over-simplifying. Theoretically, it is possible that I make mistakes; should I make any, I hope somebody will tell me. A note on my vocabulary: sometimes I use the word bank as a more general description of companies dealing in securities.

To keep the reader's attention, I have tried to keep my writings short and to the point. Mostly through illustrative examples, you will find more on the theory towards the end.
I have planned about 30 chapters, below you will find a preliminary list with a short summary. Most chapters are more or less finished. Some are more or less unfinished and should not be taken too seriously even if they have some contents, these are marked "STUB".

Savings and Loan crisis The Savings and Loan (S&L) crisis was a predecessor to the present subprime crisis. It was about profiting from fictitious profits through absurdly overvalued assets, about leaving multibillion losses to customers, shareholders and taxpayers. It was about federal support to the fraudsters. Smaller but similar to the subprime crisis, with one big difference: in the S&L crisis, many of the main perpetrators got prison sentences.
Federal Promotion To help the economy, institutions like the Fed and FHA were created. Government sponsored Fannie and Freddie were founded. Federal pressure made housing loans cheaper, first under Clinton, then under Bush. Subprime loans exploded, with private interests taking over much of the market.
Securitizing Banks used to keep mortgages. Now mortgages are securitized, lumped together in CDOs and sold as packages to pension funds and others. Synthetic CDOs are introduced, multiplying the risk with already overpriced standard CDOs.
Credit Rating Agencies CRAs are supposed to make securities trading more secure by assessing risk for default. Instead, due to greed and pressure from loan institutions, securities were rated as next to no risk, driving up valuations to absurd levels.
The bubble grows With liar's loans, teaser loans and with assurances of rising values, the banks sold more and more mortgages. To people who wanted a home of their own and to speculators. The banks didn't care how bad the mortgages were because they were sold to others, to taxpayer guaranteed Fannie and Freddie and to investors like pension funds.
The bubble bursts At first, the market was closed. CDOs were sold bank to bank or bank to investor. There was no real market price; the parts could set their own, raising them, creating a fictitious profit and reap their bonuses. When the market opened, the prices fell. Some banks played extra dirty, selecting the worst securities they could find, selling them as especially good and then going short on their customers, profiting when their customers failed.
Spreading money When the prices fell, the banks got into trouble and the Congress decided they needed $700 billion. The banks were supposed to business and consumers with loans, but most of the money was used for other purposes.
The securitizing rules At least since 2004, many banks have cheated with mortgage handling. Instead of transferring the physical documents as prescribed by law, they were registered electronically while the documents were destroyed or left with the originators. This means that the receiving trust did not have the document which means it had no right to foreclose. To resolve this problem, robo-signers were used; lots of false documents were produced.
A new paradigm In the olden days, New York Stock Exchange firms had to be partnerships, the firm partners were personally responsible for the firm's debts. This changed and now the top executives face very little risk. With growing funds, banks became more depending on fees than on performance. One result was that although mortgage modifications often gave more money, the banks preferred foreclosure. They got more money while customers and borrowers got less.
Special companies To make mortgage trading more streamlined, the banks created special companies handling registration and foreclosure. They even had a special company handling robo-signing.
Default and Foreclosure With the crisis, many home owners got in trouble. Even if they had done only what the bank told them to, the banks had no responsibility. HAMP was created to give financial relief to struggling homeowners. According to FBI, up to 70% of defaulting loans were borrower fraud. With banks abusing borrowers and lying about HAMP support so they could extract extra fees, many foreclosures were bank induced.
Dirty tricks The banks used many tricks to hurt the borrowers. Like unwarranted fees, unwarranted insurances, delayed and misplaced payments. To extract more fees, they dragged on with foreclosure procedures. Sloppy handling, including fabrication of new documents was common.
Victims Many foreclosures were the result of bank abuse, but the banks had excuses. For example that foreclosed borrowers did not deserve to stay in the house. Homes were mixed up. Even homes paid in cash were foreclosed on, something that should not have been possible. The banks violated the rules, deliberately and by mistake; no matter how wrong they were, they didn't give up when it came to fleecing their victims.
Larry Delassus and Sunny Sheu The bank wrote the wrong address and Larry Delassus lost his home. Fraudsters took his house, the court gave the house to the bank and Sunny Sheu lost his life. How the banks can get away with next to anything, probably even murder.
Municipalities Sewage system should cost $250 million, loan cost is $3.14 billion.
Motivation Like junkies, banks only demand more and more.
No one expected it Well, Greenspan did not expect it. The crisis that is. A lot of others did.
Special knowledge Greenspan and lots of Wall Street people claim special knowledge. Either they are wrong or they ae deliberately destroying the economy.
Bank friendly courts Big goes free, small gets sentenced.
Not in court The Department of Justice can waive prosecution if the company promises not to do it again. JPMorgan Chase got at least 22 waivers because they have "a strong record of compliance with securities laws."
Sarbanes-Oxley and the SEC In the Enron scandal several senior executives were sentenced, with up to 24 years in prison. To make prosecution easier, the Sarbox Act was enacted in 2002 and in the subprime crisis no big shots were prosecuted.
Courts against the banks Some judges do go against the bank. Unfortunately too few and too often revoked.
Regulators There are lots of regulators, national and international. They just won't work.
Obstructions The banks are setting the rules, with very accommodating SEC, Treasury, OCC and Congress obstructing serious inquiries.
Bank reviews The banks agree to pay compensation to abuse victims; OCC and ten banks enter an $8.5 billion settlement. Sounds like a lot but a fraction of actual damage. Bank sponsored reviews find no or next to no errors in foreclosure handling; local audits find more than 75% faulty or questionable.
Bank Settlements The big review is so mangled it has to be cancelled, random pittances are doled out to abuse victims.
Alternatives Investing in production did not give the profit that the bankers wanted. So they found alternatives. Like lobbying, buying back own stock, commodities, "innovations", moving profits abroad.
Competence Wall Street competence changes. Investments in lobbying and buybacks pay better than investments in better products.
Regulation Regulation can be both god and bad. Standard of living in regulated communist Cuba is higher than in many little regulated Latin-American countries.
Theory Greed makes you try harder. If being productive pays best, you try to be productive. If looting pays best, you try to loot. The corruption of the Invisible Hand doctrine.
More The banks do not only target mortgages. Taxpayers, pension funds and many more transgressions are common. STUB.
Even More It's not only the banks. Wall Street is attacking education, health care, energy, defense and more. STUB.
Politics No matter how you vote, the banks win. STUB.
Conclusion Conclusion. STUB.
Appendix Terms, institutions, persons, sources.
Contents List of contents in financial posts.

© Anders Floderus